Equidaily Racing Journal

equidaily.com: Opinion

www.equidaily.com

Bombs Away: 2006

A closer look at the Equidaily.com "eyes closed" BC wagering strategy

11/01/06 It was back in 2003 that we here at Equidaily.com ferreted out and reported on a rather bizarre wagering strategy that seems particularly unique to the Breeders' Cup. And part of what makes it so unique is the simplicity -- almost an "eyes closed" type of betting play...

Three years ago we labeled this idea The All Concept. Simply put, over the five year period ending with 2003 betting on every Breeders' Cup entrant would have produced a positive return in four of those five years. But even more remarkable was the fact that betting ALL entrants in every Breeders' Cup race through the first twenty years would have almost reached the break-even point. That trend is hanging tough two years later with an overall ROI loss of just 2% -- and we have to note that if 74-1 Fran's Valentine was not DQ'd from the Juvie Fillies in 1984 that win total would have rocketed into the black.

.
Betting Interests
$2 Win Wager Total
Return
All-time '84-'05
1768
$3536.00
$3456.00
THE ALL CONCEPT - Playing all horses entered 1984 - 2005 Breeders' Cup

Clearly live, winning longshots are the key to The All Concept and, as such, things got even more interesting when we parsed out the Breeders' Cup runners that went off at odds of 20-1 or higher. We've named this off-shoot The Bombs Away Play. The chart below shows the astonishing 30% ROI that has been achieved by betting every runner that went off at odds of 20-1 or higher through the first twenty-two years of Breeders' Cups!

.
Betting Interests
20-1 or higher
$2 Win Wager Total
Return
ROI
All-time
20-1 or higher
682
$1364.00
$1768.10
30%
THE BOMBS AWAY PLAY
Playing all horses which have odds of 20-1 or higher 1984 - 2005 Breeders' Cup

The chart below shows the results for each Breeders' Cup. Certainly The Bombs Away Play has had its down years -- but overall it has resulted in a profit as often as not, scoring in eleven of the past twenty years. And perhaps more importantly, since 1999 Bombers have walked away happy five of those seven years.

With the 2006 Breeders' Cup being run at Churchill Downs it makes sense to take a closer look at how The Bombs Away Play has fared during the five previous BC visits to that track. As highlighted in the chart below the results are a mixed bag -- with the plays totally wiping out in '88 and '98 but coming through with flying colors in '91, '94, and 2000.

Year
Betting Interests
20-1 or higher
$2 Win Wager Total
Return
ROI
2005 Belmont
37
$74.00
$63.50
(14%)
2004 Lone Star
32
$64.00
$116.40
82%
2003 Santa Anita
34
$68.00
$186.60
175%
2002 Arlington
31
$62.00
$143.00
132%
2001 Belmont
37
$74.00
$ 0.00
(100%)
2000 Churchill
41
$82.00
$209.80
155%
1999 Gulfstream
41
$82.00
$129.60
58%
1998 Churchill
29
$58.00
$0.00
(100%)
1997 Hollywood
24
$48.00
$0.00
(100%)
1996 Woodbine
27
$54.00
$0.00
(100%)
1995 Belmont
20
$40.00
$0.00
(100%)
1994 Churchill
31
$62.00
$96.20
55%
1993 Santa Anita
30
$60.00
$269.20
349%
1992 Gulfstream
33
$66.00
$0.00
(100%)
1991 Churchill
36
$72.00
$196.20
172%
1990 Belmont
36
$72.00
$0.00
(100%)
1989 Gulfstream
27
$54.00
$0.00
(100%)
1988 Churchill
17
$34.00
$0.00
(100%)
1987 Hollywood
31
$62.00
$62.80
1%
1986 Santa Anita
33
$66.00
$73.80
11%
1985 Aqueduct
28
$56.00
$0.00
(100%)
1984 Hollywood
27
$54.00
$221.00
309%
THE BOMBS AWAY PLAY - Playing all horses 20-1 or higher entered 1984 - 2005 Breeders' Cup

There are no guarantees, but The Bombs Away Play has scored 50% all-time and far, far more often in the 21st century. So if you're looking to take a shot on Saturday -- hey, go for it!


equidaily.com

Note: Pages on this site are labeled with the equidaily.com logo. Some links are for information only and lead to pages at other sites. equidaily.com is responsible only for the pages on this site. equidaily.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions. Always check with official sources to verify info.

E-mail any questions, comments, or suggestions:

email button

Copyright 2006 equidaily.com